From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: disass.el Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:27:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="154442"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 13 02:27:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDaj-000e2V-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:27:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36314 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDai-00024Y-Vj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDac-0001zl-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDab-0001Xe-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDab-0001X0-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDaW-0002pt-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:27:35 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUIAwcLBQsPBgsOCA3o 4uZHOzSdko8PBw0FAQYcFRIy+KLmAAACSElEQVQ4jWXTsW7bMBAG4FO8OJsYIkO2OEYHb2WItNXO 6AUUCuAuCvBYeCiyqciiMbZAA3zb/kdKiYMeDNjmJ/4kjxC9hd67GFvjI1eLP6F3caIREDe7F+N/ jeO4av2RAGWRwD1WnfHvCeoTAwHOfe8enzrz/L4eh9VLfSqC4RlD2/VOL3D9UjdXwewBf1tTOx2M qU/rga470xRns1eC3j6BKEH5CfvpDGgAu87sb87GK0nXAM9gmjxj/3g2zww9IDI4wLcvgEO3gD0N DH6G2wsgemJA+FHS0wf47wmeT4ApQ+8SKKLQYdsMd2gMwCZ4p4JhAjQVoANAkUFXDM0CZoZ6KiUf 1P0HzebqAnis9wncZnsB7QU8zNDVLkPdMxh/2mJ3tV0Au0rlJxwQ1wbwDF2Kwri7JypiC+hdht56 mycQbUOwIerIu+qNtyiniYTYBmejVpUmvtU+WhuPohRCFKEJVmilaVy5qG69FWIl5pJCaACCix++ KREklUqCqYBxIGrtUc2Pl4IfYVjzlLwAh6BILlE0P63l8oNhWK+LopxXnQPlsvickcZVmpBgwISU ptXyPMMJ79EuvU0HrS7XiB+1VVLpHMTwcF88bH7fvWox/akOP3X1qg8JgnXBWjQVFdFalxoKuIt4 aWPYuZzn0jeDKDfiJm9G4aN4AZmjUiGBh7iRKu+qmmKc9DTvH2NKygwxVhqUBjmOT5/PgV1FzsK9 5WZJ+dHdMv1NPVH56Evb+dLSGvPNzlAsHcISKrcXg1RmUHqu1N1/5SAtZkAfImYAAAAASUVORK5C YII= In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:04:07 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237474 Archived-At: In disassemble-1: emacs-lisp/disass.el:171:42:Warning: `string-as-unibyte' is an obsolete function (as of 26.1); use `encode-coding-string'. It's this code: (if (consp obj) (setq bytes (car (cdr obj)) ;the byte code constvec (car (cdr (cdr obj)))) ;constant vector ;; If it is lazy-loaded, load it now (fetch-bytecode obj) (setq bytes (aref obj 1) constvec (aref obj 2))) (let ((lap (byte-decompile-bytecode (string-as-unibyte bytes) constvec)) But... (multibyte-string-p (aref (byte-compile '(lambda (foo) (+ 4 foo))) 1)) => nil Is there any way the byte string in a byte-compiled function is multibyte? It kinda looks like a NOP to me... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no