From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A few issues with thumbs.el Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87br6zuerw.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87u0kqrsur.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87hdgon2p2.fsf@jurta.org> <87vf508myc.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87oeabsw97.fsf@rocksteady.printf.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118652246 25782 80.91.229.2 (13 Jun 2005 08:44:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 13 10:44:00 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhkXo-0007Qt-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:43:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhkcK-0003Lj-PZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhkYq-0002vo-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:44:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhkYg-0002tR-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:44:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhkYe-0002sH-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DhkYw-0000gN-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:44:54 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A41B47FE78; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:43:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Mathias Dahl In-Reply-To: (Mathias Dahl's message of "12 Jun 2005 16:02:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38700 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38700 Mathias Dahl writes: > Seems quite good although I don't like the idea of using PNG-files as > their size is much larger than using JPEG. As long as they are smaller than the block size on your file system, it probably doesn't matter... > > The file names are named according to the absolute URI's MD5 value, > which most in this thread seems to dislike (including myself). Is there really such a thing as an absolute URI? E.g. if the images are on a server somewhere -- the file name on windoze may be h:\x\y\z.png while on GNU the file name may be /mnt/images/z.png. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk