From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to stop find-grep-dired? Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:43:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <44E5DACB.10608@student.lu.se> <44E6C066.7010008@student.lu.se> <200608210856.k7L8u2mx020108@beta.mvs.co.il> <44EA99D2.5070709@student.lu.se> <87y7t7xkpn.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157010423 18187 80.91.229.2 (31 Aug 2006 07:47:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Juri Linkov , lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, ehud@unix.mvs.co.il Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 09:47:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIhGK-0004sO-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:46:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIhGJ-0001U0-VA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GIhEL-00089l-D7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GIhEJ-00087T-Mx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:44:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIhEJ-000877-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GIhNq-0003B6-Ta; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id F05C4A5006D; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:16:22 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59147 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Meanwhile, as this is becoming a general convention, we might want to >> move this off of C-c to some other prefix. (Not right now.) >> But is there a suitable place to move it? I think C-c C-k is quite ok (as a conventional binding in process buffers). Contrary to e.g. C-x C-k (which could be used globally), using the C-c prefix clearly indicates that you must switch to the relevant process' buffer before you can kill the process. > > I propose C-x since the mnemonic value of the x shape as in "cross it out" > sounds pretty obvious. Do you suggest C-x C-k ? C-x C-k is a prefix for many keyboard macro related commands. It's been there for a long time now, and to make it useful, it need to be on a C-x C- key. What other key do you suggest for this then? I suggest we leave things where they are (and have been for ages!) -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk