unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
To: "Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com>
Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: doc patch: "Saving Properties" merge into "Format Conversion"
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 11:14:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3fy6e8e0q.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7ccd24b0705030130w60031695he516292124ded46@mail.gmail.com> (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu\, 3 May 2007 10\:30\:01 +0200")

"Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:
"Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:

> On 5/3/07, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> We might use the trunk to make Emacs 22.2.

What a wonderful idea!  Soooo completely illogical and out of sync
with any release procedure (that actually aims are making progress
towards a release).

>
> Why? What would be the advantage of using the trunk for 22.2 instead
> of the EMACS_22_BASE branch?

His statement above and the current talks about merging the RMAIL mbox
branch (which IIUC don't really have a current maintainer) could
indicate that RMS wants to make a 22.2 release which includes just the
Rmail branch...

>
> There is at least one specific disadvantage, i.e., it would delay
> merging the unicode and multi-tty branches onto the trunk.

Indeed!

I'm not usually paranoid, but isn't this just another strong
indication of the secret(?) plan to delay -- as much as possible --
not just 22.1, but also every possible future release.


-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-03  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30  8:15 doc patch: "Saving Properties" merge into "Format Conversion" Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-05-01 17:25 ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-02  9:28   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-05-02 17:44     ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-02 19:34       ` Stefan Monnier
2007-05-02 19:50         ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-05-03  2:02         ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-03  2:19           ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-03  8:30           ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-05-03  9:14             ` Kim F. Storm [this message]
2007-05-03 23:55             ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-04  1:00               ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-04  7:57                 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-05-04 21:17                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-04 23:05                   ` Kim F. Storm
2007-05-05 23:18                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-05  0:03                   ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-05 23:18                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-06  0:04                       ` David Kastrup
2007-05-06  0:56                       ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-06  4:51                         ` Miles Bader
2007-05-06  7:37                           ` David Kastrup
2007-05-06 11:05                             ` Jan Djärv
2007-05-06 11:37                               ` David Kastrup
2007-05-06 10:53                           ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-05-06 11:17                             ` Miles Bader
2007-05-06 11:56                               ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-05-06 12:22                                 ` David Kastrup
2007-05-06 12:51                                 ` Miles Bader
2007-05-06 14:25                                   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-05-06 22:26                                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-07  2:41                                       ` Stefan Monnier
2007-05-06 16:50                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-06 22:25                         ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-07  9:38                           ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-05-04 20:50               ` Kim F. Storm
2007-05-03  9:59           ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-05-03 23:55             ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-04  9:14               ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-05-03 13:55           ` Stefan Monnier
2007-05-07 15:59     ` Kevin Ryde
2007-05-08 20:21       ` Thien-Thi Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3fy6e8e0q.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk \
    --to=storm@cua.dk \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).