From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\ vs. ?\s Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:29:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120037005 24192 80.91.229.2 (29 Jun 2005 09:23:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 29 11:23:14 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnYmg-0006p4-JB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:23:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnYuh-0002oO-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 05:31:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnXyG-0005Mb-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnXxq-0005Gg-8F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnXxp-0005Fu-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DnY1T-0000ld-EO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 77EBC47FED8; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:29:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:07:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39875 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39875 Juanma Barranquero writes: >> Humm. Yes meaning "OK to change" or yes meaning "Not OK" to change? >> Because in my question, "yes" meant "yes, I'm gonna be very pissed if >> you change it" :) > > Or did you mean: yes to change "?\ ", no to change other "?\ "? > > Because, after taking a look at it, many or most uses are "?\ ", so > it doesn't really pay to change ones and not the others... IMO, we should change all of them, but is this really the time? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk