From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rcirc.el Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:31:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871x2u6ina.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> <87oe5x65wh.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128944481 27459 80.91.229.2 (10 Oct 2005 11:41:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 10 13:41:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOvwb-0004Bc-Sb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:35:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOvwa-0004NQ-V0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EOuxS-0000Jg-TD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:32:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EOuxQ-0000HC-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:32:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOuxO-0000Gg-Pf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:32:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EOuxO-0002cp-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 967215EE06E; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:32:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Ryan Yeske In-Reply-To: <87oe5x65wh.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> (Ryan Yeske's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2005 03:08:30 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43790 Archived-At: Ryan Yeske writes: > It is well tested under both 21.3 and emacs-cvs (22). I'll update > this text, or should I just remove it? I suggest you remove it. > >>> (require 'cl) >> >> Do you really require cl at runtime or just at compile time? > > How can I find out? If I only use macros from the cl package? I guess so... > I must > admit I don't really understand when to use (eval-when-compile > (require 'cl)) and simply (require 'cl). We prefer the eval-when-compile form whenever possible. The best way to find out is probably just to try it and look at the byte compiler warnings (I think it warns if CL functions are called at run-time). -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk