From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:12:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <831s0xd3z1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="147796"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 08:13:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRW7a-000cJQ-BN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 08:13:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42966 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRW7Z-0003uG-1Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:13:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRW6y-0003uA-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:12:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRW6y-0008Ox-0J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:57766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRW6w-0008MZ-AO; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRW6k-00083q-4l; Fri, 17 May 2019 08:12:44 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEUiCwouHBg9LSxbTlK8 19KXoap+eIEQAgGRgkedAAACWUlEQVQ4jXWTwXKbMBCGV/jAVZKn9RVEQ66uVOsJIA8QEPegojNx Dnr9/gt2kkmmO5jB+vSv9l9J5O6xDM75aBC1Uj8jNZY/8PcSU0qBQdM0PyIZa9QWl2EDzrq2bS8A 5jMYx7HjCF8VGN7Ik6Pa2g8QQx9Ch9/koPgE3J6o6xgYW38HnKq5gT9fgHP/AZGBzFnsoH8HKaLe E5HwcO4CB3xiccuLn4QUZo5o2BhQ8dgPUCRWlCTs/GLd0vVjh3Q7gCLnws2zcQv84WEfiZv7AVIY Q99voLB3kKL72/dT2J2nQm42tJ/3ciHZy92BNjcfW8H9pihFDYP65hxVodynyEB/AXg9JYBcvIN4 36geQJc7+PUOsM4GoDjdARaelj6k72DhosZdYYpaUakfag8AmJa0KSQdrbk812qVwoXkUrx4VuBQ Ul4fBimJSHeDn+2yTABWqjXndiC8afWJnaCJiajMRfN2dBsofYKJ59Y0liqVpTi8XjEBoD6i16at iooKmQuT12sGyGU7lzzDmIpeH/PVOFGUDPLRHdCxE1dinW1aR9vwmnUltVI8iXxKZ3ugvMfbuVJK lo8AjUsDCtjjla4MrgxU0bjbDZFKk1G4ekfMISH0HWCDldDcxumFKAv3YrgdwvlkkjsuOFghKvRJ GH3GeMunFlu0jBOAppL0eW2IDst0A9iPLhriFiIRtVPaQEgLzlWsSa4rCWT6reTqK+2TX7DxUEjM V0TF7hzR4np0riZaibgo9J82/1ePZEjF32Ve6R7Ch2lbI38KZETrQvgGMiuV8SnY+h8O/RJq58gt 2AAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: <831s0xd3z1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 17 May 2019 08:50:26 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236627 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'd prefer if we made the byte-compiler warnings smarter in this > case. It shouldn't behave like we are shooting ourselves in the foot > in these cases. > > Do we have a means to tell the byte-compiler "don't emit this specific > warning for that function"? If not, perhaps we should. Yes, that would be very nice. Perhaps a general er form? Like... (without-byte-compilation-warnings ...) Hm, that's perhaps too general. What about: (without-byte-compilation-warning 'callargs ...) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no