From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 13:26:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <831s0xd3z1.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnohbhny.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="124183"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 28 13:40:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaSd-000W0S-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:40:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32871 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaGG-0006ie-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:27:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaFh-0006iM-Hu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:26:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaFg-0004YZ-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:26:45 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaFg-0004Y4-Dp; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaFb-0004bu-4x; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:26:41 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEXOvLGdb3Dr6ctqJSe+ op0zwygmAAACRklEQVQ4jW2Ti43sIAxFDXEBOLgABqWAYUgBQNx/Te86s/u0s1qkSIFj/LuG+u8V 9uqLPk8lt8h/gn62sf4AuWvvFn8BnQCSe3+D9n2equXcAM7gIMPq67xy7k16pxBv0G5yUjS+PZ1F loP8dgYQ7MKFlkJHKTRhIzeoj3G13pQBHcyJME2U4mGwEBP4jg4EZuKg6MxiipDpBiqwt0Qkig3u N40ANmEu2YxCa8ZTuugoeyVFQIFjpq3lwW2ajZlP3MgtqxmftHVJhw0qsyMtMjShmVlA+me6npE9 +Y7gCJGVzISyakYj735WkizY8jDTuMmGRESZUCByNTtt2OBdcvYuDS7rC2QAC/3q2QUvj0d6kaK4 gSAoCH3OaYq0LehOJlMtCDGa2Z75FZDk9dqWAyQrI/gotGBwdasLoGPYw9WTyqUccbFNcSBWGNvj WHaU8qirFDIArBiOGkOJteDG43WhJYsGUYBZjBQXTI6jHtfdKwdHrGvVuNcSeRkU6SgQK9Sd9lQj cp571hqya4414zx2nojHvF/9jGxvYGugmFp4MC0SDIkDaM3qqeU2GOpF77u7OmMBMi/qJAsjHGiN j2gnd2fTk1G5aEuzvaf9WYlZGrmiCtDV3g+nIXvor2hW9xu9ja8XBdHKhN74xgTo5xd4OphQemqa Y5Px/3ECoHzkpEnt/WbfwHWm40Q9ST7A7fPA8EraLPwA9ysFyCfA+gleDubsaeZP0G6AmZQ+PoCX 4o3hhFI+wPP+JV6/QfffQo90yTf4BwPxoGP8DyvhAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:12 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237084 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: >> (defun foo () >> (with-suppressed-warnings (obsolete foo) >> ...)) >> >> That seems like a rather drastic way of doing it, I think? > > Why do you say that? It introduces another progn level... Perhaps that doesn't matter? Or is removed by the compiler? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no