unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, xemacs-review@xemacs.org,
	sxemacs-devel@sxemacs.org, Steve Youngs <steve@sxemacs.org>,
	xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Merry Xmas and a... OMG, what did you just say?
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:51:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d5wqw5qv.fsf@jin.myrkraverk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1CkMTK-0004QVC@rattlesnake.com> (Robert J. Chassell's message of "Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:05:38 +0000 (UTC)")

"Robert J. Chassell" <bob@rattlesnake.com> writes:

> Steve Youngs <steve@sxemacs.org> wrote
>
>   o I want a development environment that doesn't get boiled
>           down in "politics".
>
> That is wonderful!  

Yes, it's great ;)

> What method are you going to use?  After all, neither you nor any
> other developer is interested in politics, but must have others force
> politics upon you.

We have the PPM to resolve most "political" issues -- I hope.

> The XEmacs people decided on irrelevance: be obscure, do not do
> anything that supports the rights of others to develop.  The GNU
> people decided to fight, even though they do not want to.
> Fortunately, that mostly means most do not have to fight.

I do not understand, I don't think I want to even try.

> Are you going to make sure that every contributor makes sure his or
> her employer or university provides legal papers that will convince a
> judge that the contributor has or had the legal right to contribute?
> That way when someone unfriendly sues a company you have never heard
> of for plagiarism (obviously, no one will sue you or other developers)
> the case is thrown out of court.

What do you mean?  Do not assume US laws apply to the rest of the
world!  In Iceland, I don't think any company or organization can
suppress a contribution and I have the court rulings to back it up.

Individual contributors will simply have to guarantee the legality of
their contributions.  Is that concept so hard to understand?

> Or are you planning to be so irrelevant and obscure that no one
> takes someone else to court?

Some of us live in countries where stupid law suits don't happen.  Or
get thrown out of court or ruled *right*.  At least I've heard no
horror stories about any.

> Also, how are you planning to avoid the politics of patents?  No one
> into software development and freedom will go near them, unless
> forced to.  So what will give you the power to keep them away
> (besides being obviously irrelevant, or are you planning on
> irrelevance)?

What software patents?  There is no such thing in europe (yet) and I
honestly don't think there ever will be (for long anyway).  I can't
wouch for Australia (where Steve is), but I presume the laws there are
roughly compatible with the British ones.

I get annoyed when people think the world is limited to the United
States of a certain continent.

Johann

-- 
This line is left blank intentionally

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-31 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-31  2:21 Merry Xmas and a... OMG, what did you just say? Steve Youngs
2004-12-31 13:05 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-12-31 20:51   ` Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson [this message]
2005-01-01  0:22     ` Robert J. Chassell
2005-01-01 16:27     ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-01 17:07     ` David Kastrup
2005-01-01 19:24     ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2005-01-01 18:04   ` Alex Schroeder
2005-01-01 19:21     ` Robert J. Chassell
2005-01-01 23:00       ` Alex Schroeder
2005-01-02  1:16         ` Miles Bader

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3d5wqw5qv.fsf@jin.myrkraverk.com \
    --to=johann@myrkraverk.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=steve@sxemacs.org \
    --cc=sxemacs-devel@sxemacs.org \
    --cc=xemacs-beta@xemacs.org \
    --cc=xemacs-review@xemacs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).