From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: shell-command - missing shell-quote-argument for program? Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:43:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <452517DC.5010007@student.lu.se> <45251C56.8010603@student.lu.se> <4526401C.7060604@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160138737 7721 80.91.229.2 (6 Oct 2006 12:45:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 06 14:45:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVp53-00014x-Lc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:45:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVp53-0007C1-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:45:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVp4J-0006Lr-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:44:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVp4F-0006Ei-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:44:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVp4E-0006Dx-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:44:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GVpB6-0005DH-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:51:49 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DEE2FAC02B; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:44:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri\, 06 Oct 2006 14\:34\:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60459 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> I can not find any uses of explicit-bash-args in the lisp sources. > > C-h f shell RET > > "[...] > The shell file name (sans directories) is used to make a symbol name > such as `explicit-csh-args'. I don't know, but I would assume there are more bash than csh users these days? So maybe that should be changed to explicit-bash-args ? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk