From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Guile in Emacs Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:29:37 -0600 Message-ID: References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <87aauiho3y.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <1271028837.6164.55.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <1271102739.6067.38.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <8039yz34ka.fsf@tiny.isode.net> <1271173887.6067.53.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <87ljcqqxoc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87sk6y2s45.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <5D7593D3-41D2-42BA-8215-1AF2BFA06A71@raeburn.org> Reply-To: Tom Tromey NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271269906 4865 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2010 18:31:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org discussions" , "" To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 14 20:31:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O27NA-0006bl-Hz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:31:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49121 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O27Mv-0003FT-TD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O27LQ-0002wL-UC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41014 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O27LO-0002ts-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O27LJ-0006wJ-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O27LJ-0006w9-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:41 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3EITdwX002598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3EITcAv014124; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:39 -0400 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3EITbpn023027; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:38 -0400 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7050B3782DC; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:29:37 -0600 (MDT) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <5D7593D3-41D2-42BA-8215-1AF2BFA06A71@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:49:26 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123660 Archived-At: >>>>> "Ken" == Ken Raeburn writes: >> it will fall noticeably behind systems that compiles >> to native code, whether directly or via C. Ken> Both approaches are getting serious consideration from the current Ken> Guile developers. FWIW, there was once an elisp JIT compiler. http://www.mundell.ukfsn.org/native/ It was rejected: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-06/msg00103.html Tom