From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Let's tell we are using GTK+ Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:31:35 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87adaqdxqt.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1060029474 6534 80.91.224.253 (4 Aug 2003 20:37:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: terjeros@phys.ntnu.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 04 22:38:11 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19jm5r-0006mo-00 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:38:11 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19jmA5-0002r2-00 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:42:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19jm2k-0000mp-CC for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19jlr4-0006Bz-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:22:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19jlGB-0006rE-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [129.22.104.62] (helo=lewis.CNS.CWRU.Edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19jjBH-00058h-Un for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:31:36 -0400 Original-Received: from multivac.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.114.26]) by smtp-b.cwru.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 1 (built Aug 19 2002)) with SMTP id <0HJ300B0HVCNOI@smtp-b.cwru.edu> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:31:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 11639 invoked by uid 500); Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:31:57 +0000 In-reply-to: <87adaqdxqt.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> Original-To: Miles Bader Mail-followup-to: Miles Bader , terjeros@phys.ntnu.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Original-Lines: 12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15807 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15807 Miles Bader wrote: > Do people really always include the `+' in the name? It seems sort of > superfluous and annoying in this case. Why not just use the symbol > `gtk-toolkit' for emacs? It would be nice if the same name were used everywhere. So in the absence of any concrete problem, I'd prefer "gtk+", since that's the name given to that package by its maintainers. What makes + any more superfluous or annoying than g, t, or k? paul