From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-process bug Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 23:15:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k69eyddj.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyj0r41g.fsf@lrde.org> <20060524112846.GA12046@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <87bqtmjrsh.fsf_-_@lrde.org> <87odxjakox.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jrlewm.fsf@lrde.org> <87pshyqgtd.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyiuq9t5.fsf@lrde.org> <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148851125 22713 80.91.229.2 (28 May 2006 21:18:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 21:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Agustin Martin , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 28 23:18:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkSej-0007YZ-Ok for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 23:18:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkSej-0003jO-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 17:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkSeY-0003j9-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 17:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkSeW-0003hq-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 17:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkSeW-0003hg-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 17:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FkSjw-0001Uc-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 17:24:00 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id D44C7A50029; Sun, 28 May 2006 23:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac) In-Reply-To: <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac's message of "Sun, 28 May 2006 22:26:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55384 Archived-At: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (Micha=C3=ABl Cadilhac) writes: > (Final ?) patch attached. Looks good to me! I wonder whether the pid should be added to deleted_pid_list if SIGCHLD is not defined? In that case, it would be a memory leak... But I also wonder if any of the async process stuff actually works without SIGCHLD ?!? Are there any systems which support async processes but don't have SIGCHLD? --=20 Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk