From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: State of VC? Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:17:23 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20080122164306.3B33C83045C@snark.thyrsus.com> <200801222207.m0MM7rlR014153@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200801231901.m0NJ10CP029274@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Tom Tromey NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201222501 2138 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2008 00:55:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 25 01:55:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JICqm-0001Iq-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:55:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JICqM-0008IN-2f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JICqI-0008I5-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JICqE-0008FZ-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JICqE-0008FW-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JICqE-00015p-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0P0sdJB023237; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0P0sdPg027989; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0P0scZ2010121; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:54:38 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 50819378320; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:17:23 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <200801231901.m0NJ10CP029274@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Wed\, 23 Jan 2008 11\:01\:00 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87461 Archived-At: >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Nicolaescu writes: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-01/msg00549.html >> (this patch is probably bogus) Dan> Does this still happen? This might have been due to bugs due to the Dan> introduction of the ignored and unregistered states. I will try to look soon. >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-01/msg00410.html >> (a patch, not really a bug) Dan> Don't know about this one. If you think is correct and you tested Dan> it, I can check it in. This one I think is ok. I'm not in a super rush to get it in though; this list was really just stuff for ESR to mull over. [vc-status] >> I think it has potential, but it is not ready. Dan> Sure it's not. The point here is just to move it from the Dan> "experimental, can be deleted anytime" state to "work in progress, this Dan> is the future" so that more people can work on this. We are in complete agreement :) >> This is not the same if a marked file changes from modified to unmodified. >> In this case it will disappear from the listing. Dan> OK. Would this need a change in the interface to the backend? I don't think so. Maybe it would be nice to have a function that is called to indicate that the update is complete... that's come up a couple times. Tom