From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merging the xwidget_mvp branch Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:33:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447238199 22576 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 10:36:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: jwiegley@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 11:36:28 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSkz-0001iF-Ac for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:36:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39128 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSkt-0003Kv-8x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 05:35:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSk1-0003ER-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 05:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSiu-0003Hi-GZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 05:35:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mx6.bahnhof.se ([213.80.101.16]:55408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSiu-0003G6-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 05:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (mf.bahnhof.se [213.80.101.20]) by mx6-reinject (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C3A418F2; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:33:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at bahnhof.se (MF3) Original-Received: from mf3.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mf3.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IjG8muXcyHt7; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:33:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mta.verona.se (h-235-62.a149.priv.bahnhof.se [85.24.235.62]) by mf3.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988323E8CDA; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:33:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C9F4EE5CE; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:33:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at verona.se Original-Received: from mta.verona.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (exodia.verona.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygAaXervD1jW; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:33:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from exodia.verona.se (www.verona.se [192.168.200.15]) by mta.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CC84EE5C9; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:33:28 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:21:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 213.80.101.16 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194049 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: >>>>>> Stefan Monnier writes: > >> We've already been through several rounds of reviewing, so I'm sure he'd be >> very disappointed if it doesn't get the code merged after all those efforts. > >> And IIRC the technical debt seemed quite OK: the interaction between >> xwidget's own code (the part that deals with the xwidget API) and Emacs's >> own code is very similar to the interaction between Emacs and the various >> image libraries. > > Since this review was done under your tenure, Stefan, I'll defer to your > judgment on this one. I generally have an aversion to large new features > without a driving use case, but you deserve at least one "midnight > appointment". :) Did we come to an argeement regarding merging this feature? I think I read in another mail that you do agree now, but I'm having trouble finding anything in the recent torrent of email. If you now do agree, when should we attempt the merge? Is there a hard freeze on friday? > > John -- Joakim Verona