From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-partial too costly ? Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:42:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k647501r.fsf@lrde.org> <877j06ocvo.fsf@lrde.org> <87eju99npb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158612231 6445 80.91.229.2 (18 Sep 2006 20:43:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 18 22:43:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPPxh-0003uD-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:43:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPPxh-000754-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GPPxT-00070E-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GPPxT-0006z3-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPPxS-0006z0-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GPQ0M-0008Uo-IF; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B4228A0021; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:43:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87eju99npb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon\, 18 Sep 2006 11\:52\:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59986 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >>>>> Since the creation of line-move-partial, going to the next few lines >>>>> has become a P*TA. >>>> >>>>> Is there any solution ? >>>> >>>> I installed a small optimization -- pls try again. >>>> >>> AFAICT, it doesn't fix my problem. >> >> I have installed an more elaborate change to line-move-partial >> (involving a new primitive `window-line-visibility'). > > Can we consider the FOR-RELEASE item fixed? > > ** Michael Cadilhac's line-move-partial is slow. Micha=C3=ABl still has to confirm that the changes I made in the last few days fixes the problem. If not, I have one more thing I can try.... --=20 Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk