From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Completion Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 18:48:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535993194 8296 195.159.176.226 (3 Sep 2018 16:46:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:46:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 03 18:46:30 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fwrzh-00022K-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 18:46:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fws1n-0003jx-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:48:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fws1g-0003jg-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:48:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fws1c-0005Y9-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:48:32 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:51008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fws1c-0005Xt-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.221.165.getinternet.no ([84.212.221.165] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fws1Z-0003lc-KU; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 18:48:27 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEVaQTotHRt1VUeniXGE Y1EjFRI9KycZDApEJ3J7AAACMklEQVQ4jVWTsa7bMAxF1QDPuwY5qyP47UXtD2gcda8GRms0RJ09 uP793kvaD6gA2xIPLylRtIsppSWOfCVOdRmdc7RFfQ06Ixjc0DnOoilOlwX+zVGfuExRg4wUEIxn ZNJIwAStufgfGNwl0vw6FPEAGsV1tW/eFLqmqYOza75Vb4rPyKH7WH632gcfDPzC85imaZ7T/Gzw 76uBO60c82SgHYp7gslGAvA1iyW/pwTfx/SYZgAfnmIg3pZk/g+CGmT3VpL7eID0mBVQwST3OJ7p p7/IIVIM3HiIhYmmec057LXafdzGmObIcPOwXkU2yQRL/LyQM1CMAJnJFdx8a61rqKsP2+YFxXJ6 C8MFBa+932EN/ro9URLnjtJWkX3fN0Eg6bGrE2D3WwEpRB7VddorALIrwJCcSzmuEneEvAa2TUrZ T0Xru8O+m9INChpU5QvwZTv6sI821IEOkL5GVFE5wLfxC4z0L4fi9aE9C6uCnSdyLw11GfkXRJR+ 0UMa6Nr7wq5Fv0PIEyIctokBYBkWgA0CXC1aUhV2rz+WxFPwzuHv2ttdDHxP48YSZwUVIM4a6mcc YN5k9UcObWor84oWKVs28Mf1/PRo2rq+fREAzvGf0MgRxNfgpaiCrOITyOCAPUnvMIcEXeJ99iFj EVje5iyC789AEPMg1WGOjjkJh14IQCbyiCY9gz2vBGtAjuqzmG/GiQFwGzigGUT7LONvld0ay3ks aVdRfr1hL8jZ/gGPwA7K9u7JaAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 1 Sep 2018 07:49:55 -0700 (PDT)") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:229213 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > All completion candidates you see come from the same style. You have > no control over which style will actually be used for any given input, > other than ordering the list ahead of time. And you have no way of > knowing which style was actually used to produce a given set of > candidates. Ah, I see. That explains the somewhat unpredictable behaviour I'm sometimes seeing when doing completions that I've never figured out. I mean, it feels like DWIM 95% of the time, but... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no