From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display word wrapping Date: 26 May 2004 23:55:28 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040526125439.GA10795@fencepost> <20040526194515.GB29575@fencepost> <20040526213327.GA14004@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085636026 18019 80.91.224.253 (27 May 2004 05:33:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 05:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu May 27 07:33:38 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTDWM-0000Fq-00 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 07:33:38 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTDWM-00051I-00 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 07:33:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BTCzC-0002WN-V2 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT7c2-0006da-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT7OE-0004ey-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:01:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BT6Ms-0001K0-EX; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id A3B9A47FE3E; Wed, 26 May 2004 23:55:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <20040526213327.GA14004@fencepost> Original-Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23998 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23998 Miles Bader writes: > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:01:41PM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote: > > > Gnus is "safe", it's important, > > > > So upgrading to the new Gnus is seamless?!?! > > _Nothing_ is seamless, but the version of Gnus proposed for merging is > apparently very stable (it's been the Gnus "stable" version for a year). I meant from a user's point of view... Can I continue using the (exact) same Gnus configuration and setup after the upgrade? > > Anyway, in my opinion, Emacs should not be released without a Gnus update, > even if it delays the release by some amount. Waiting until the next Emacs > release would be absurd. If the new Gnus is stable, why does this have to take so much time? Perhaps you could install the new Gnus now and later fix/merge changes from the current emacs CVS version if there are problems (I suppose you can do that easily with arch :-) -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk