From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next-error-last-buffer Date: 01 Jun 2004 23:33:44 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <871xluig40.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87d64sgsw9.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4nhdtv6u9n.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086125682 12011 80.91.224.253 (1 Jun 2004 21:34:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 01 23:34:32 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVGu0-0004ct-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:34:32 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVGu0-0005D9-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:34:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVGuF-0006bn-HB for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:34:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVGuD-0006bf-Mp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVGuB-0006bK-LI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVGuB-0006b9-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:34:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BVGt5-0007Er-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 566665EE0A2; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 23:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Ted Zlatanov In-Reply-To: <4nhdtv6u9n.fsf@lifelogs.com> Original-Lines: 42 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24364 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24364 Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Fri, 28 May 2004, rms@gnu.org wrote: > > > next-error-no-visit: M-n > > > > Let's call that forward-error-message. > > > > previous-error-no-visit: M-p > > > > Let's call that backward-error-message. > > Wouldn't that be confusing? We already have the prefixing adjectives > "next" and "previous" established, now users have to also remember > "forward" and "backward." I know Emacs already does it in many > places, but I think we should try to limit the number of adjectives > in this case. I also find the forward-/backward- prefixes inappropriate in this case; to me they indicate movement in the current buffer or some other "closed context". In contrast, the next-/previous- doesn't necessarily indicate any specific sequence of the visited items (navigating in a list of places to visit). > > > next-error-file-no-select: M-}, M-N > > > > I'd rather avoid defining M-N and M-P as different from M-n and M-p. > > We don't need to do it; M-{ and M-} are equally easy to type. > > > > Also, let's call these commands forward-error-source-file > > and backward-error-source-file. > > Ditto as above. > Ditto. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk