From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: image size limit? Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:55:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87oe5v7q19.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87k6giiqh3.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87hdbht7v9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d5m3zu20.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <85ek6hitq3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129759181 23371 80.91.229.2 (19 Oct 2005 21:59:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 19 23:59:38 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESLvg-0005xc-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:57:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESLvf-0001XE-PC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESLvO-0001VZ-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESLvM-0001Uw-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:56:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESLvM-0001Un-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:56:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ESLuz-0007nq-6b; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 692015EE02B; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:56:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44359 Archived-At: "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > it would be clearer to write this: > > ! If the value is an integer, it directly specifies the maximum > ! image height and width, measured in pixels. If it is a floating > ! point number, it specifies the maximum image height and width > ! as a ratio to the frame height and width. If the value is > ! non-numeric, there is no explicit limit on the size of images. Much better indeed. I have committed the changes. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk