From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Nested sit-for's Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:05:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87y7tp90i1.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87hd0bjvoi.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <44E493E0.5000205@gmx.at> <44E58248.7020202@gmx.at> <87irknqzpv.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <44E8D9B6.6040700@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156111688 25772 80.91.229.2 (20 Aug 2006 22:08:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 21 00:08:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GEvSW-0005eu-SR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:07:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GEvSW-0003Fz-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GEvSL-0003F0-1d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GEvSK-0003Ds-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GEvSK-0003Dl-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GEvZW-0001U4-Mn; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 730208A0041; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:07:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: martin rudalics In-Reply-To: <44E8D9B6.6040700@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:52:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58580 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> IIUC, the recent addition of current-idle-time by RMS was supposed to >> fix the sit-for in jit-lock problem in a different way. But so far, >> RMS' changes to jit-lock have not been installed... What's up??? > > IIUC, `current-idle-time' would permit to replace the ugliness of my > `run-at-time' with yet another `run-with-idle-timer'. Hopefully. Sounds plausible. So I hope RMS will commit his jit-lock fix soon! -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk