From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [bug] Gnus and Footnote Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:58:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164736940 27807 80.91.229.2 (28 Nov 2006 18:02:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 28 19:02:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp7HS-0007xJ-ME for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:02:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp7HS-0007dq-1K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp7EZ-0005Uf-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp7EX-0005SH-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:59:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp7EX-0005S9-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gp7EW-0005t6-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp7E6-00073X-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:58:38 +0100 Original-Received: from 10-169.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com ([65.35.169.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:58:38 +0100 Original-Received: from david by 10-169.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:58:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 10-169.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UBERvBq2XUPSEFSe8saje+dGjUw= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62976 Archived-At: Leo writes: > Hi all, > > [Gnus v5.11] > > If I have more than two footnotes, one¹ will be placed above the > signature and the rest²³ below the signature. This post is an example > of this issue. > > Do you think this is a bug? > > Thank you. > > Footnotes: > ¹ footnote 1 > -- > Leo > ² footnote 2 > ³ footnote 3 Sounds like a bug to me... Should be one or the other, and I vote for below the signature. Dave