From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 11:30:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878t8lfgu3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526463114 23080 195.159.176.226 (16 May 2018 09:31:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 09:31:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Uwe Brauer , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 11:31:50 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIsmk-0005t0-0l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 11:31:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36765 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIsoq-0007U9-Vi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIsm2-0006eo-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIsly-0000U9-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIsly-0000Sg-3e; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.221.165.getinternet.no ([84.212.221.165] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIslZ-0008JC-Lj; Wed, 16 May 2018 11:30:58 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEWrQScWAwRJDw16KBvA UjTygkfcZT75rGBOWYYHAAACO0lEQVQ4jVWTQZKcMAxFPdjTe3OCxlyAYGrWzqDiAik32yyMDpAM 8fXzZbt7ul0FCx7S1/8IZcdJydGzdYNz1rVL6SueEgWAnPM/XPkL1x/VARBz8M5OalkXX88P9XZV ZuMU5sG60c/2ftTPAkjPzvb+GbxdDW2JQgHzS4UhSibIIwfajlNWAJEevXPfrdwdKL8ATXfQj3MF UFgG62FzKO/bBoJ2/hkgAV/BPHrfjV4FXRoNcFhAB1kPCUMC+n4YC1Ba5vFuRGRdUYZGAXhZwBXT dT2ARr4CMBSez26iWuE6xN4XoLTSfhAwi31YFYOTVBhxIn6snZfON4DUNSYTo0Nv/Yf2XQFq2yPT OhriAH/Tpr3yWll0OM4bryMRE8BCZQUK2PZ8rjJtwLBtNwRsfJwxGEY/a8WmqYCPGPeTN8YMtRNV sB23GGOON06rHbc0XyfkrewHx3JyjryiPnToFpSy79xIjPzZG4lnEoIKjvmEDG6f+PITaeSvBBxo Uwm2y11+64lM09ghgPtX58Yraa2MgEssIJ+3IycvQU8bicZ7A9A+onhRCiurHuCMJzMfWzCQxpI/ gXwDYHQx+C9S0TgfAD8KIlP+kr41cgUpUcL+ESqOkofMBaucNqg7N72CA0kG7bFoIwwe914CogBX AcdWckr8KMHyCbjwo6KCpLF994oCIheAP9XPLxoPACO+hlinEiBeEoiBwb09fwCWv7U4P19B3m/7 rxpJaxUbwPnbQCzTygdJsqlE639mOAPtMcA+JwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 15 May 2018 22:52:38 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225332 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Does the exploit depend on Javascript code that the MUI will execute? No, it just depends in