From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracking Date: 15 Jun 2004 10:11:17 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <863c4zy8mt.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> <20040614233916.A697.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <20040614233301.GA32624@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087287104 26510 80.91.224.253 (15 Jun 2004 08:11:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 15 10:11:36 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ba92e-0006yB-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:11:36 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ba92e-0004mN-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:11:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ba93Z-0000Bn-S0 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:12:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ba93S-0000BX-CR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ba93G-0000BI-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ba93G-0000BF-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ba92G-0003dn-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 65468 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 08:11:05 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 08:11:05 -0000 Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <20040614233301.GA32624@fencepost> Original-Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24981 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24981 Miles Bader writes: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:09:38AM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote: > > We could start small and simple: > > > > Create an emacs/tracker subdirectory and create text files 1.bug, 2.bug, etc. > > with one file for each bug. > > > > Then add a simple header to the file, initially just: > > Please look at the link I posted earlier about Andrew Suffield's bug system > which covers many of these issues (it's an email-based system). I don't know > that we could use his system unchanged, but it might be nice to have at least > a bit of consistency of format or something. Sure, but I don't want to go ahead an implement this before we get some sort of consensus on the topic. So the question is: Would the proposed "trackers in cvs" + "emacs frontent" (with no email interface) be sufficient for you and others who have voiced a strong rejection of web based trackers? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk