From: Leon <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: emacs gtk2 toolbar bug?
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:53:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37j121nd8.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87r6zau3j7.fsf@furball.mit.edu
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:16:28 -0400, Chong Yidong wrote:
> Leon <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> In gtk2 emacs, when tool-bar-mode goes from on to off or vice versa,
>> the bottom edge of the frame will move up/down the height of the
>> toolbar. This will make the minibuffer have different heights when
>> the frame is maximized.
>
> I don't understand what you mean. When the Emacs frame is not
> minimized, toggling the tool-bar moves the bottom edge of the frame,
> it's true; but when the frame is maximized, toggling does not move the
> bottom edge.
>
When it's maximized, toggling the tool-bar will make the minibuffer
have different heights. It's like the mode line has been pulled up and
down. This is tested in gnome 2.14. In motif window manager, even when
emacs is maximized, toggling tool-bar will move the bottom frame edge.
However with lucid emacs, the frame size remain unchanged and so does
the minibuffer, in both cases. I happen to have two versions of emacs
in my machine:
- GNU Emacs 22.0.51.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll
bars, multi-tty) of 2006-08-14
- GNU Emacs 23.0.0.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.1) of
2006-08-11
> I do not see a drastically different minibuffer height with the
> tool-bar either on or off, at least on the version of Gnome shipped
> with Ubuntu Dapper.
I'm also using the same version of gnome but with fedora core
5. Fedora's policy is pushing all its patches to upstream so they can
maintain the minimal set of patches i.e it's unlikely my gnome behaves
differently.
--
Leon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-21 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-20 17:31 emacs gtk2 toolbar bug? Leon
2006-08-21 4:16 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-21 6:27 ` Jan Djärv
2006-08-21 8:57 ` Leon
2006-08-21 8:53 ` Leon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m37j121nd8.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk \
--to=sdl.web@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).