From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Killing buffers with mouse Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87d53iwjn0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <45F17A17.80200@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173568043 25073 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2007 23:07:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Angelo Graziosi , Chong Yidong , Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 11 00:07:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQAei-0004WD-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:07:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQAf8-00042t-CJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:07:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQAex-0003zG-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQAew-0003yK-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQAew-0003y4-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQAeP-0001FP-Fr; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx19.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id F3C3AFAC025; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:06:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat\, 10 Mar 2007 11\:00\:06 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67693 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > It might be a reason for someone not to spend time on it, but if someone > else decides it's important enough and comes up with a patch, I don't think > it should be grounds to reject the patch. If we are moving towards GTK as default in 23.x, then it better work with GTK (Jan says it can). So whoever submits such a patch should at least make it work with GTK too. But if it doesn't work on some of the other platforms the use of such extra features may be limited, as programmers might be reluctant to use them. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk