From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New build process? Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:41:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20110726184220.GA6390@acm.acm> <87bowg6fre.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E2F2084.7070001@gmail.com> <8762mo2jeg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87y5zk13vh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311759716 13599 80.91.229.12 (27 Jul 2011 09:41:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 27 11:41:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm0ch-000360-DM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:41:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm0cg-0004br-Uu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:41:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm0cZ-0004bF-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm0cY-0004H5-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:41:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:59571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm0cT-00047x-2F; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB451853BA3; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424D81C00089; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:41:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hV6+wTmCtOhQ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:41:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hase.home (ppp-88-217-103-152.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.103.152]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:41:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I've gotta GO, now!! I wanta tell you you're a GREAT bunch of guys but you ought to CHANGE your UNDERWEAR more often!! In-Reply-To: <87y5zk13vh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:15:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142367 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Andreas Schwab writes: >>> >>>> Tim Cross writes: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Andreas Schwab >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Tim Cross writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> a typo - their quite common you know. Context usually helps to >>>>>>> recognize them. In this case, autogen is probably the most likely >>>>>>> candidate :) >>>>>> >>>>>> What has autogen to do with emacs? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> autogen.sh then if you must be pedantic about it, >>>> >>>> You wrote: "Previously, you ran autoget and now you run ./autogen.sh" >>>> (with typo fixed), now you claim: "Previously, you ran autogen.sh and >>>> now you run ./autogen.sh". >>>> >>>> That does not make sense to me. >>> >>> And it is not what he has written at all. >> >> In which way does it differ? > > I fail to see how I could answer this more authoritatively than the > original mail. So why are you claiming there is a difference? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."