From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mail-Followup-To and Gmane and emacs-devel Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 23:03:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170427213824.12196.63777@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170427213827.B6BDC22040@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <5ro9vgebfr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87o9vgl4b3.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494277400 23697 195.159.176.226 (8 May 2017 21:03:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 21:03:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 08 23:03:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7poK-00064N-Eu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 23:03:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33581 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7poP-0002B7-N6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7poF-000286-H4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:03:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7poA-0004jP-Mc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:43237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7poA-0004fm-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.209.243.26.getinternet.no ([84.209.243.26] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7po5-00060q-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 23:03:03 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEU/QFQXCR8dEiccDiYf HjUcDCQNBhsgFyevZmOwAAACSUlEQVQ4jXWSTXObMBCG1Rmmd6U1OXsF1rlSydlDd6JzrNnmGjuu 7qEQ/f2+wsaJM80aPLAP735KEbPxnTci0RtH3hNR77sfquHeex+9gBhnOvA8kDeKCL5YgBfvbRu7 aIeBSHnni7PcnYjzro1kGKDzDvG7M5ASkkoe1VFDiNzJystKSsjoOvnJSprG4K3TWkTrCO7Jx6YH oC4i2ApAHqRExZcNKSGavmVEwq/4pdsR+jEqDqGNYytaigRZDDlDALsxU7SIslqJ/BUZ2oFmYEca KMtsRTO0DsUarywEZFuROhX7Yy1xT+KUHVCspYd0tv2Omt5EpzhM8piHlLaJZvK8AM6w34l5dvcp 3WAUnlQoYEpYC3zkNpA0hl2vMoecX9OBm19UyoHKedr1asyQICdTwxlbI5cOhiIXEF7SHjNumHEx bZ7RPKkM8IqEYQyBi5HRE3akeOTq65PiixFtyqbUxd7A2oKo7QKqCxgsUVB5zDgu7hKpZxswP1al bw7NWw4ObIfd+B/AADQiZ8jjBxBkR6WYPPZXfqaHTwA2tCsAU3zn3ar7pPUMMHb8V4u/wki1m5Pn 6cg891g6vcfkNXLAj81+v4ymKou8sScw1el4nk11NwMo8gmkdAtUBX86K9jHrNDL6UmHE1jPI8n5 pU5XpvUZaEjqdarvDmlDaZNuaVHo+km9ty9nMEz6qLZbru6xynK9LIpJX2Wpa1WO1WOJtRS2xyd6 XwCfkpzBvtZzJerkxPN1waXcQetZft0JwLoIPgH1Pn20fz1YNgkbGTfPAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: <87o9vgl4b3.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:28:48 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214703 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > So for a while now I've had it set this way. Actually, since I post > through Gmane, my headers are (the Gmane header is translated on the > Gmane side, Lars implemented that): > > Mail-Copies-To: never This makes Message behave (i.e., don't include you in the Cc list)... > Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes This makes Gmane insert a Reply-To header in the mail, which is probably what's making the problem here (i.e., dropping everybody from the Cc list, even those who'd rather be on it). > I'm not sure if there's a better approach, so I'll change my headers if > anyone has suggestions. But I really don't want the drive-by CC's back > in my mailbox. I think the Gmane-Reply-To-List is the only realistic solution here for this, but you could also just split to /dev/null all mail that has both you and emacs-devel in the Cc headers. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no