From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: go to bottom of mail message Date: 19 Nov 2003 15:19:24 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200311191126.hAJBQY6C008722@beta.mvs.co.il> <200311191155.UAA15601@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069248378 5021 80.91.224.253 (19 Nov 2003 13:26:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ehud@unix.mvs.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 14:26:13 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMSLV-0001vy-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:26:13 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMSLV-0005U9-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:26:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMTF8-0003ap-3G for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:23:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMTDF-00036m-Tk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:21:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMTCd-0002vl-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMTCc-0002vR-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 35569 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2003 13:19:39 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Nov 2003 13:19:39 -0000 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <200311191155.UAA15601@etlken.m17n.org> Original-Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17915 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17915 Kenichi Handa writes: > (3) I prefer the key "/" than ";" for > rmail[-summary]-end-of-message because "/" is usually just > right of "." but ";" is usually right upper of ".". As "." > moves point to the beggining, it seems strange to type the > upper key to move point to the end. By the way, for me the > ideal keys are: > "," go to the beginning > "." go to the end > because my fingers already got used to "ESC <" and "ESC >", > and "," and "<", "." and ">" are on the same keys. I don't use rmail anymore, but as a general note, you should not make decisions like this based on a specific keyboard layout. For example, on a Danish PC keyboard, the three keys to the right of "M" produces the following characters (shifted in the first row): ; : _ , . - while < and > are on a separate key, and / is above 7. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk