From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New text property: `inhibit-read-only'
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:20:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m361eeb028.fsf@stories.gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvbno6sb4x.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 16 Nov 2014 23:30:14 -0500")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> What is different that the solution used in Custom buffers can't be used
> or doesn't work well in eww?
Custom buffers uses a bewildering number of hooks, bindings and
... mysteries to achieve this pretty trivial thing. It binds all
inserting commands to `Custom-no-edit' (and then has an overlay over the
text input bits that has a different keymap).
To inhibit deletions, it uses
(add-hook 'before-change-functions 'widget-before-change nil t)
that checks stuff in some contexts
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (text-read-only "Attempt to change text outside editable field")
signal(text-read-only ("Attempt to change text outside editable field"))
widget-before-change(3 6)
delete-region(3 6)
Hm. After that backtrace I'm now able to delete text in the Custom
buffer.
Anyway, with a new buffer `C-k' again fails as it should with
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (text-read-only #<buffer *Customize Apropos*>)
signal(text-read-only (#<buffer *Customize Apropos*>))
kill-region(124 126 region)
but I'm not quite sure how that's set up.
And and.
It just seems ridiculous to me that all modes that need this simple
thing (a read-only buffer with some bits that are editable) would have
to jump through all these vaguely defined hoops.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-17 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-16 22:45 New text property: `inhibit-read-only' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2014-11-17 4:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-11-17 7:47 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2014-11-17 10:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m361eeb028.fsf@stories.gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).