From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GDB startup Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:07:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <16914.27405.844755.48839@farnswood.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108563059 20150 80.91.229.6 (16 Feb 2005 14:10:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Roberts , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 16 15:10:52 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D1PtE-0008T1-00 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:10:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D1Q9B-0006E0-Lu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:27:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D1Q7U-0005dd-5m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D1Q7M-0005ae-Ao for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:25:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D1Q7K-0005Xn-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:25:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D1Pq0-0000kU-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 34398 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 14:07:29 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 14:07:29 -0000 Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:06:18 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33545 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33545 Miles Bader writes: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:16:02 -0500, Stefan Monnier > wrote: >> I guess post-command-hook is the closest thing. > > It gets used way too much though -- we shouldn't be sticking all kinds > of random crap on post-command-hook... I agree. But post-command-idle-hook might be useful in some way... -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk