From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: eieio Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 14:46:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="126329"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 14:46:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hc85B-000Wi0-6C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 14:46:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hc859-0000dV-OG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hc84U-0000dO-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hc84T-0008D4-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:58810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hc84T-0008CV-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hc84P-0006cz-J4; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 14:46:11 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXoDwD+XQD+VQD+QwD+ lwT+TAD+OAD+awKIWcxFAAACcklEQVQ4jW1TQW4bMQzkKXeqNXQWDcHnLiG9wEDOlsD4GlSwet5i AX2/o7XbpEkEY9fgkBpyOEvb+b/zvI41uNh/0of44BCLHHt7B2zjeQx2tbaU+43eJY8VcbHc23Fe 9SBB2DmOtWrvTXHVeIRxS5RoyAeQUTG2f4CJmOZZYOkHjeftDNYVrFrtZRZ01XKlMTaEVw4c0Yvu QH65ehr7+c3sijZT1Z61uNNGvM58Fo+rdKmaVRP7dSPh4RgIc+yKCsC34DdU8GBxIQRXkdy09ZzC GGcS71EiwQmGSwr2qtcdCH4VJxc8akqIt6wntAoAt0OiVSr61zrn8+iTXCxewCASNZnOCRNCg4LI 2LsKUrVY1taSMHsqIbAbcmD5ltErxNW2SPQELfyKLbiAdkuFurlLcifi4udwBSutfdllT1IPngy9 CrtDMFMzqxnIYrKRLSVWzIcmLLkdKRbDRjHPHla/8upO7DHRUiATgHq9K49dDT+fkJUhYtICpSAJ SynCK56gRUUyWCDEiytiJgU9WBHnz2QJAdMSIIlOjcvBPBxCqQi81FKxpHZBsnOBJ9Bsegb6Wa0L 5ImGeWE2UiuxwRgZu0iogAar3wFNsefW5071EgTU2BMAaH2cnmy/5HCcvsZvmhMAcqfJNNUENcF+ 2SsMyFwnbrtVLzDMzn2mCAkN2dOEcprxMXagwZAYEF7r2YQDPpI7kG+p1NzAg69lqiXhDvQb5kNT oO9wCbqVOwfMlLU/Dng0Fd4H7G/n8b+lOeFfgOiJiPrrjmAtG71F6fF6hRXjdyTRx/PUlL/T5zg9 dazqc3hSlZP/GrDrIP0SWbY/XrkPcDa+1HsAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:13:32 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237674 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> What's the path forward here? > > It's been obsolete since 26.1, so I think we should just wait. Sorry, I meant -- are all these object-print methods supposed to be expressed as cl-print-object methods instead? And if so, can they be rewritten that way now without breaking anything? Or would that break out-of-tree code that calls object-print? eieio.el has general fallback code for object-print, but does not consult the output of cl-print-object for the objects, so I guess that might break something? But... could we do that, without going all recursive? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no