From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: man.el Date: 20 Feb 2004 17:49:41 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077293571 30427 80.91.224.253 (20 Feb 2004 16:12:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 20 17:12:40 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AuDGa-0004s3-00 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:12:40 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AuDGa-0005Vf-00 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:12:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AuD9c-0001gv-5s for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:05:28 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AuD9X-0001gV-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:05:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AuD8s-0001c2-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:05:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AuD18-0007Oc-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:56:42 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 26875 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 15:49:52 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 15:49:52 -0000 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:20084 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:20084 Richard Stallman writes: > Regarding the change below, why is the current window's width more > likely to be correct than the frame's width? (Neither one is > guaranteed to be right.) If the frame is split horisontally, window-width is a better guess than frame-width (and if not split horisontally, it doesn't matter). -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk