From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:47:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87y8cx4b3e.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110454730 23702 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2005 11:38:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 12:38:49 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Lzg-0007OB-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:38:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9MEY-0003Al-0g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:53:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Lfa-0002Na-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Ley-0001w1-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9LR6-0000oS-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:02:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D9LCA-0007Gh-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:47:11 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 43305 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2005 10:47:08 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2005 10:47:08 -0000 Original-To: Piet van Oostrum In-Reply-To: (Piet van Oostrum's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:18:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34411 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34411 Piet van Oostrum writes: >>>>>> storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) (KFS) wrote: > >>KFS> David Kastrup writes: >>>> Juri Linkov writes: >>>> >>>>> 2. goto-line is not too frequent command to deserve the sole >>>>> M-g key. There are many other goto-related commands that could >>>>> share the same mnemonics and have the common M-g prefix key. >>>> >>>> Forget it. No precedence, > >>KFS> Huh? M-g was a prefix key before the change... > > Was it? In gnus it is bound to gnus-summary-rescan-group. At least in the > version a month or so ago. I'm talking about the global binding, not some buffer local binding. IMO, the gnus M-g binding should definitely be removed in the *Article* buffer, as is makes good sense to use goto-line to another buffer based on a file:linenumber found in a mail message (e.g. a backtrace in a bug report). The M-g binding can remain in gnus summary buffers if people prefer... -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk