From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: called by a process filter? Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:31:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hdh81srh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115977026 6473 80.91.229.2 (13 May 2005 09:37:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 13 11:37:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWaM-00010U-KG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 11:35:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWjT-0008I0-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWYh-0002Nj-Lf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWYd-0002LI-K8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWYc-0002JH-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DWWdE-0002XE-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 75462 invoked from network); 13 May 2005 09:31:51 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 13 May 2005 09:31:51 -0000 Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Thu, 12 May 2005 10:25:39 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37069 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37069 Kevin Rodgers writes: > Kim F. Storm wrote: > > I would expect it to be buffer local, and as such, it would only be > > triggered by filter functions that update that buffer. > > But when a filter function updates the buffer, this change function > (whether global or buffer local) should do nothing. Can you please show us the code and tell us what you try to accomplish. As Stefan has already suggested, an after-change-function is probably the wrong tool for the job. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk