From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network Security Manager merge time? Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:29:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lhn7cfe0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87egszcd3i.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87h9xvavjm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874mtuc1hq.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416569445 28973 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2014 11:30:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:30:45 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 12:30:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrmQB-0003jt-0R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:30:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrmQA-0001kB-FP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 06:30:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrmPm-0001k2-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 06:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrmPe-0002dB-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 06:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:45143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrmPe-0002Z2-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 06:30:06 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XrmPK-0000eG-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:29:46 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEVnrsdORkROWV00bIyc yddhZF45dpuJzQ+iAAACbElEQVQ4jWWSTVPjMAyGTbLNGacbzqmz5Byijc/dqcIZ2pqziUH//yfs K6cUBjTxxNYjWR+WMd+k+rpN+ksu6q/ALq5gLN2gvM0nGLnWFINZYl3RB6giQEytubk1Resq8kOr oCIx4jpckHpTOLe42PUA3nsp+34Zo7F3pnhdxjIuEaAHIN8uiA+wkWJcosP9Q+9baQFwsLemjEXp jAwI3PdtHNtY+aqFh2Z+Kaq65G/cbV2vJX2TXW3tD6UxpdnZ3U8QizruLDyw6tHa/qIvXop71Weg Ul8CF10JfUd0AS3vT0Re0IjKdl5EMuiG2Vo9CUEki9m5zk98Y+329ejlUwxW+sXql8Id9l7SFUx8 UEDNSZL9Cs7sbVDwIvdHOGkUUsCz2OfGUuhTeEHjyVFS8M6lhBAaCf4dwKeHoHWIvLEo2MrUhHD0 PqVmKyvwcg/ioAchv8BIgzMLTeEqW8l5G0lnTkLhdGXbFHrxGaBLSVLz/IGeSecoMT8KGl/vrrcd SbNKgXnJ5yZ/4TidUgYNH9YLRiw1R2tyHTXzkZBvLw9wQL8CniYBbH7zAVE67RLeysdwSl49Joag pwYDCshzeNK3TBShP7w9CldoqH/fh4A0xZAMPJ+Z928XYGC3Rx1EA1v1YfZI308bHGZkhSKn88z8 F/46CUPYhKdTBpS44UfWjiEtekJJK/Dx3x+umGkdoGnzASjOvB/44NeJwhOcaPUQP5SCR1nHSlNQ 4PLokc5GonVAVrCjLm80LgZkHIm6UUE3dq6DrHbwTyM5zK3pnCNVA0PtMtW/oU/x6xrVjEzCGCMd yq3V0IofiP4DfYLx5ETHYHQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Max Tundra's _Mastered By Guy At The Exchange_: "Hilted" X-Hashcash: 1:23:141121:emacs-devel@gnu.org::2gsD9FMsWi1L/ZfT:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000rtr8 In-Reply-To: <874mtuc1hq.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:41:05 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1XrmPK-0000eG-H5 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1417174187.01655@AIipO7lMeTtk+4lF9Gucgw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177938 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Looking at the code, there's a lot of copy+pasta there between the > GnuTLS verification in `gnutls-boot' and the message collection in > `gnutls-peer-status'. Could you factor that out so there's only one > sequence of checks to maintain, especially since I'd like to deprecate > the GnuTLS verification in favor of NSM? Basically call > `gnutls-peer-status' in `gnutls-boot' and then iterate through the > messages (which can be the simpler version you use instead of the one > with the hostname attached I have in `gnutls-boot'). I can do it if you > prefer. Sure; go ahead. The verification checks should probably be factored out from `gnutls-peer-status', though, since `gnutls-boot' doesn't need the other things it calculates (like the fingerprints etc). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no