From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Installing `struct buffer' patch Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:58:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4D47DFD4.1040108@gmail.com> <87r5ba7ejz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxly7e4f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297702740 29875 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2011 16:59:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 17:58:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1lA-0006Ow-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:58:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp1l2-0002Vq-4k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47120 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp1kq-0007Tp-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1kj-00066F-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1ki-000668-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:21 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1EGwKiP027409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1EGwJEW030986; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:19 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1EGwJxf015616; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:19 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D88343781C7; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:58:18 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <87mxly7e4f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:16 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136004 Archived-At: Chong> How bout replacing B_ with something like BUFFER_VAR? It is fine by me. (Actually, FWIW, I preferred the first approach :-) The only drawback I can think of is that BUFFER_VAR is longer. Could you and Stefan talk and agree on an approach before I implement it? I have the corresponding keyboard-local patch ready to go. I was holding off on that until the breakage from the buffer patch was all fixed; but I'll also wait for a naming decision and change the keyboard patch to suit. The good news is that the keyboard patch is the last one. Tom