From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gdb in emacs 24 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:54:01 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87k481gma9.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319036067 1765 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2011 14:54:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Reitter , =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= , "emacs-devel@gnu.org devel" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 19 16:54:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGXX5-000134-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:54:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41709 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGXX4-00009L-Fi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGXX1-000086-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGXWy-0004oU-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGXWy-0004oG-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9JEs32M020052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9JEs3E6031468; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9JEs1Zl024066; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:54:01 -0400 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:35:30 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.25 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145335 Archived-At: Stefan> How 'bout some way to just check whether `mi' is the Stefan> current interpreter. It doesn't have to be a dedicated command, just Stefan> a command which will reliably behave differently (e.g. return some Stefan> recognizable value if `mi' is used, and return an error if not). Pretty much any MI command will do that, e.g., "-list-features". Tom