From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Issues marked as fixed in 25.2 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:19:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479162030 19143 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2016 22:20:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:20:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 14 23:20:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6PbS-0000yP-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:19:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6PbV-0000tc-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:19:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Paw-0000tW-Oy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:19:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Pat-0006BM-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:19:18 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Pat-0006AX-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Pai-0003MC-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:19:06 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEUMCAcUDw6Ad1wnIR8H AwIJBAPRY5coAAACWUlEQVQ4jWVUTY8bIQw1meUOQblvbPU+4O69UuFO1PH//yt9ZpIqqzrKhPD8 7eeh/CZFIUXXmcwOM4v4NZpAao7mQkfvx1jHSRHaNRoZUaTelwktAbBTmpRDov6b7yKT253owgLh q3AGMIQduHzSBgCfJ2DDtaa0+5WvDBFu0iohuMCVweoiF+am8KWciMbRbYw+caRNS0qhUsj4Mz4O ZNznSkq8wFpq8pzN+gtQbXDGXJM54AaHA0FVmnj1cQBAkHGsCgEo7xZ09zbsB67HMYiSAxptU/dE 1T310WGwqUAZfYkO7P2Uaegt1ziDVkMI+ngB3kLeJyLd0Fii530fDsjtgWnF7sFfAPJDnhZy2a3b m4XNR+Ob5VLjGhqAlRbOrVWbWW/2AkY/DNOdVRPaqDHY1z8LV/ojWqmgcqUv74PBovvULyIVfYoz WXQA6n2gIrt6zzVFZ4i3dLav5SlurE19XGTRAYzz5yLY5vro2H4yiUAAIc+PFdQIBLbgeVrwD0Tb WGqiRFfwi9zqjw8z2WTEBpXhAZce6iHScFkavgrN5tTZPAU0W0G/5tnCfWOgG8Bjy02dgM+ktH2e QexXLfDDPlZPJ6/oFYvTw6IHmJY9K7qIcxKAE2Rb3XBigp68uIfahiVMtdbVCAyYPUhZQKhh7d4b cC7nLHsTEPlkNnN2YO3oQ6+g1DLIaN4dm03n7oK0Qt7EouWsiXwVfOFb3RAHDAq+C8xUslYogE7N S/GUwwKeL4oUA+aRsU/5aRHyKrt6kfwmADyAeMxvcr4ovis/gQQet//u+S9kGK20NlCdTQAAAABJ RU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:00:47 -0800") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209400 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > Btw, it's exactly this sort of confusion that I wanted to avoid by using a > 3-branch scheme (current release target, next minor, next major). > > The 2-branch scheme we have now makes this sort of confusion a regular part of > ongoing development, because we'll always encounter the case where a fix on > 'master' ends up becoming part of the next release, ahead of whichever version > master was marked as at the time the bug was fixed. I don't think there was much confusion amongst most of the developers. If you take a poll, I think you'll find that most of us assumed that "master" would end up as 26.1, and were just wondering when somebody was going to get around to running the numbering script. (And prodding gently. Perhaps too gently.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no