From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Madhu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not able to display \u110BD and \u110CD in Emacs Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 22:13:47 +0530 Message-ID: References: <83bkwkbfn1.fsf@gnu.org> <837d78bct1.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgk49n9l.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8us9j6p.fsf@gnu.org> <83levnamv1.fsf@gnu.org> <837d779kgx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32465"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:syqBA7F69vKSHLGCjxKMI+jL2hs= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 05 18:57:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nmemh-0008Ae-QU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 18:56:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37760 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmemg-0005gI-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 12:56:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmeZu-0000N3-MJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 12:43:46 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:36742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmeZs-0003yE-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 12:43:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nmeZq-0000e4-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 18:43:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289251 Archived-At: * Sameer Singh : Wrote on Thu, 5 May 2022 21:39:29 +0530: >> I believe there is a similar problen with composition of devanagari >> stress accents with devanagari numerals > > Does it even make sense for the stress accents to appear with the numerals? > Shouldn't they only appear with the consonants and vowels? > Please correct me if I am wrong. Can't speak for the unicode consortium, but I believe it is the practice in marking certain specific accents in rig veda and atharva veda (which I enumerated). check the table on the last page of Wikner's document at http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/vedic/Vedic_accents_doc.pdf which shows the examples I wrote about. (I think I've come across unicode text in the wild which used these, and so assumed these are rendered "visually correctly" by other software)