From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: libnettle/libhogweed WIP Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:34:49 +0300 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <87inlyrfni.fsf@lifelogs.com> <837f2eb845.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziedpyy1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83d1b75u8a.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2znntaq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87o9u8q4a5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83tw3xbklg.fsf@gnu.org> <87zictm415.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83podoqchd.fsf@gnu.org> <87podnnbi2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8760ewi3rw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r2xjgilq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83iniug7ql.fsf@gnu.org> <87fudyhkhy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8360euf4d3.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2xhfsre.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83o9slecp0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zibw96r9.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8xz5jxw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501083375 27048 195.159.176.226 (26 Jul 2017 15:36:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:36:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (darwin) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 26 17:36:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daOM2-0006gV-SX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:36:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38813 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daOM8-0004Mt-KQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daOL7-0004JO-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daOL4-0007QX-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45086 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daOL3-0007Pw-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daOKq-00036p-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:34:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:W+l2TZm+wz7IgVxnUhnTqoL+5/8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217043 Archived-At: On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:52:59 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Can you give me a recipe to reproduce the problem with your distribution >> and packages? EZ> Once again, I just run the gnutls-tests file, that's all. You can run EZ> it interactively, if you want. I did! With the same GnuTLS version as you! And it worked. I don't have enough information (although you've been very helpful) to know why it's failing for you. The tests work for me in many Docker configurations I've tried, spending many hours to set them up. Also our current build system passes them, I believe. So I'm asking for more information about your environment so I can reproduce it exactly. EZ> Frankly, I don't quite understand why you want to reproduce it on your EZ> machine, since it seems to be so hard for you. Just tell me what you EZ> need to know, and I will collect any data you need, because I can run EZ> this under a debugger. I'm sorry it's frustrating, but I just don't know what and where is failing. There shouldn't be a failure where you get it. The AEAD ciphers are a bit newer than the rest, but your GnuTLS release shouldn't have any problems according to the ChangeLog. Ted