From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:20:37 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444072864 3574 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2015 19:21:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:21:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 05 21:20:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBJd-0000H9-G3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:20:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBJc-0004gU-T6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57433) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBJY-0004fx-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBJU-0005tA-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]:35367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBJU-0005sp-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:20:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pacfv12 with SMTP id fv12so188693136pac.2 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:20:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=d7OOvFNgWwJQOHJ74rglO4zp0HFwBLUXJ1n53dQYa3A=; b=JgWDcPWBE2265+PV3wEpHp/Smir6Hds9QOPzJLyohzNqhhp4yCrCYlOlGZvx9bDpZE D8bZLMYHPbZN8njMqIG2IQR/mc88Co49V1g7f2vM2DWtzlYEcz2qXnYgS8FzINWNB6Ct H2pMaCrTvifpcrIWmktH9wjVb/6Ih4seiT9WcYaM6B2OZLALWT+pSk6+ha/huwZ1o1C/ M1MGDIIdI/zF55LdaO0BESy3jjonbHm7XsXq5mEWNIYCMV4FcVl+JvwcpywB8sICy3oa nKcvV3dOx6AJVZf3uBa8DFjq6MC707k1QXaTtfa44sJ16a/KB0CKa09ltfrYk03ko7OD RXVg== X-Received: by 10.68.189.198 with SMTP id gk6mr41491190pbc.141.1444072843829; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bz1sm29273963pad.36.2015.10.05.12.20.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4256EF074A25; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:20:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:10:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190958 Archived-At: >>>>> Richard Stallman writes: > If it really works usefully with GCC -- if that is not just a theoretical > idea -- then I won't object to its supporting other compilers as well. That's great to hear, Richard. Any solution we choose should never preclude the opportunity for GCC to outshine other choices. The main thing is that it is GCC's responsibility to be better, and not Emacs' to prevent better options from being chosen, simply to accommodate a lack of progress by GCC. John