From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:46:51 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87twosp5ke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fv0cm64g.fsf@gmx.us> <87si4bsktk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9komkty.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447732328 11266 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2015 03:52:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , Pierpaolo Bernardi , Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 04:52:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyXJI-0000UX-Se for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 04:52:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55486 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyXJI-0000rP-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:52:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyXI8-0007yl-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:50:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyXI8-00029V-2R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]:34834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyXI3-000281-CZ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:50:43 -0500 Original-Received: by pacej9 with SMTP id ej9so90023136pac.2; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:50:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=QJz3iK4TH49x5pBrtNTWKflfbKZNjQwMOi2BAqdFI0Q=; b=qAtJ0B9tiX9cxChl9Z+x+CV7ihydpMfr0mnUItxEBod/Foqp5jv3yh2kKOIOgA9JhT FaX91otJWtP0KMbKw4INrvnaq2FR0dYvHiWjmvtznYK/OXYFLHIsvyLwJhEISvAHySBU EYTofUZq5I6gCq1ua5z/bpM5vC2qLKwTFlkjJGPP5jm7FxYZIBWhGynadzFgescDue4P EoZkyeOEyh2PlV1jU13Dt0vD0rAEIerqg8oGdDi6FKve84Q/sHIsygh6MflhZmfYDPtL 1euuMA40w6By3N2BfFqEttgPyM3USxkCCDfdz3Nd5pvSYKf8eTMMBBycMejsAICG+L4G d/pw== X-Received: by 10.66.222.68 with SMTP id qk4mr60290038pac.89.1447732242652; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:50:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id sg4sm39527456pac.48.2015.11.16.19.50.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:50:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3516F107FE923; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:50:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:42:30 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Karl Fogel , David Kastrup , Pierpaolo Bernardi , Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194626 Archived-At: >>>>> Karl Fogel writes: > This is assuming there's still time to make the reversion on the release > branch (it would then get merged to master soon). I'm not sure whether there > is, and hope someone here who is tracking that more carefully can say for > sure. I'm happy to do the reversion, if you're pressed for time. I would like C-o to not indent at column zero in the emacs-25 branch. There is no pressing hurry. John