From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Mac port Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:21:00 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87bn9a8an8.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <87wprxfkvx.fsf@gmx.us> <568622AA.2000805@dancol.org> <615CB17D-3C40-477F-B576-3C3250C15202@gmail.com> <56862EFA.7020907@dancol.org> <87bn95p72f.fsf@acer.localhost.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451773280 20143 80.91.229.3 (2 Jan 2016 22:21:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 23:21:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aFUXx-00056Z-A0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 23:21:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFUXw-0003lS-Ep for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:21:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFUXs-0003lB-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFUXo-0006Mg-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]:34139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFUXo-0006Mc-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:21:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e65so129304441pfe.1 for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:21:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=dhz9fJmeNej+9SYnBKcDl7XQm+/1Be7Y+dlVWIlTKx8=; b=URXSL2FtKXDXVZndi5RokEWs/yLccWMPOWJEYuVllxqFE2Jr7YeRSMSIl395zk6aUb iXr6OWEmoEozoDJEks8UW6/XetbaRSFILrbximLN/TvUvn1LZMe67riRgzUymAsiJK7J 9msFRnqyocq06iySgjrAuzecNntpUFXAYzkoMK/lX9bl8dp4hN9MnTlfV3ZAj0+NO6BC qlaswycqxSHdtab+08/h45nKx95qzXZ6L5POogtMh4Dzuz8iW2MiF1ugpei35qUJpKzt yONgwph5SYr6hm0/hAW488FuRBCV9I7n/op9MtcS70rkzwumYLCaGHUIxyU6b6Y2YegV CmeQ== X-Received: by 10.98.10.137 with SMTP id 9mr99102808pfk.37.1451773264215; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:21:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rt6sm116144632pab.17.2016.01.02.14.21.03 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:21:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8EDCA11FAF699; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 14:21:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:54:51 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , emacs-devel X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197388 Archived-At: >>>>> YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu writes: > I'd rather like to avoid having/maintaining multiple versions of the Mac > port, because that doesn't look better than the present situation. Currently > I feel inclined to keep it separated from the standard distribution. Unless I misunderstand, right now you are maintaining a patch. If we merge most of your work (though apparently not all), doesn't this just meant that the size of the patch you maintain becomes much smaller? I'd think that no matter what, this is a win for any fork maintainer. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2