From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: igc, macOS avoiding signals Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:20:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <799DDBC5-2C14-4476-B1E0-7BA2FE9E7901@toadstyle.org> <878qrxoayj.fsf@gmail.com> <8734i5o6wc.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyh9mpn5.fsf@gmail.com> <874j2l1hei.fsf@protonmail.com> <874j2lmd37.fsf@gmail.com> <87msgdkt29.fsf@gmail.com> <86h66lnjrt.fsf@gnu.org> <868qrxnfrw.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5ccl2zx.fsf@gmail.com> <86msgcm1nm.fsf@gnu.org> <86a5cclyfy.fsf@gnu.org> <864j2jnauz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15263"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 31 16:21:42 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tSe3x-0003qI-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:21:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSe2o-0001Xu-Se; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 10:20:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSe2n-0001Xf-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 10:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSe2i-0004RA-8t; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 10:20:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aa67ac42819so1413881266b.0; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 07:20:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1735658422; x=1736263222; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gDUrCfz6uJAw4dFPqqUg3MZCA44HNYLBYWlUPkp8Nik=; b=Y1T1SY2fqZExtYtaTnynMDY0pQmILCOjMLGHwoBIHEXUtvERP6SGMGitrhuKPFR1q9 734nMoKU0Ju4nwe+xcsiSYeIMCNbyNjtpdeD2JRGz/q3NyjTtOMU7HY6zPko7QBpTsJs LQqmAo47mgux2mcpS7zeW6t2f614Jq7Arepb4wZK35mTRvWp0qJkgxhPJYXBHzWI5v4U r1WKK1PaapAEAsWEiRXhc64HKMGpbz/Ee7S8HNPVMRz5sbp8aXMTuReNeEWHlyLjbgVM b4SWKHcaAQo3kVjn+aS772MsvbaCcLKbgcLCZnWzXwD/b7tUs+GvuAJWXT3QDmtSfh0v xqtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1735658422; x=1736263222; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gDUrCfz6uJAw4dFPqqUg3MZCA44HNYLBYWlUPkp8Nik=; b=KZF+0UnZuSvRIjKGcPvpC1DbDbuOoXW6pSXtiZsTG/WN0ywb2tl+5fYYObhKHljN1/ 0CDfCtHaRhL+ewTnAYkzLrYVA+ikoaCOYjZ/x3McJYS/X15hvxrBZZ2vnY1OSH7jNgDS Z6xnuCaobWuxCthALsUASKzbWjzM5BsCRzKXXotN/9CUmju3AmADAFxONhanr6hREaDt +xbIJl+aUvlUPG9ZxvP1vYcO19Wb+kK9URbbqnF+NIbDnl610+aSoB9+VvSvvngWs20V +w0dMjtGLBxoNh54Gl/RHNRRyqblebOOtHbPYRtLQgqLPZuB7sxCmvS1pao+Nz5aopVy QhVQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXTbWepKb0z2EtpWH5Hm0cv6qPrRpkKIwzXbuEO945/kr6vpnxl1WtrIrq/ah9O3oIL1K+y/USDwS8kQQ==@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyoJl3CXPldyYQxaUtLLtnvY7qnC9PlVKEYnv2Cug/oLfdas0ld /zx+Ko0ectUA95SAJaYGh8WyB+kF4l9PNaWaykMcRmzQCTCvelZy9YkYIw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvpv9hZWfwcSTLAcXIIRMr+g5dnUkV2p7vuey5k0qGjwn24Cqezq4rH4e2EzGZ FJtiiiA/i3AZOMs3nu1IxqRfzwmzZYFZ7vyoqsp0Efy3/xN0eqDKVuLX83mkQvDoK8xTMB8xiEx Law3PmRMMXanqxaNQsdunQnQ8rKPZwxOCOL3kHKqQo7+jTw/2mDEMstv1MaXqKvBpUCaYX5HP51 afmDOJ7dkq7JKdB4h9kGO0xwl+WWb+bV8rol3X9hnoJC6Z5vw0CjLVYURTZnvL6Z8cePg67FiEM jUrL4++DbpCAToNauLUGG/vP5zF2wuvq+E78x7JeqSbzjzqAwPhS7R1QWWm+sHWYrw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH88nOn2581lWeMi6Rb7gms1pUv7D89GvvC44/co9jF8WCEEfhaTzJipOVJQPrYJd16qaqB7A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1b85:b0:aae:849f:3255 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aae849f3398mr2205666866b.34.1735658421575; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 07:20:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from pro2 (p200300e0b7216c0021e5e367c6afc189.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:e0:b721:6c00:21e5:e367:c6af:c189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-aac0e892bb7sm1577977666b.43.2024.12.31.07.20.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Dec 2024 07:20:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <864j2jnauz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:14:12 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::636; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327530 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann >> Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org, >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:05:09 +0100 >>=20 >> >> Maybe, after reading igc.org, that is acceptable maintenance-wise? >> > >> > Can you show a patch? >>=20 >> We haven't talked about what to do the sample after get_backtrace yet. > > OK, let's talk about that. What did you have in mind? > >> And I'm not sure if you accept the approach now or not, TBH. If that's >> not the case, we can stop here and save time. > > I don't think I have a clear idea what this approach would be. I > thought showing a patch was a good way of getting us on the same page. > But if that needs a lot of work, then maybe describe the idea in some > detail first? Will do if the process_pending_signals turns out not to work. If that works, it would be even better, I think.