From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs IDE features Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:13:25 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <561A19AB.5060001@cumego.com> <87io6dl0h0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87lhb82qxc.fsf@gmail.com> <87oag4jk74.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k2qrki45.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83oag3oosv.fsf@gnu.org> <6909324d6de8929192a27fc0be8267d4@mail.iq.pl> <561D6773.4080003@cumego.com> <87d1wijwfs.fsf@fastmail.fm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444775223 19620 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2015 22:27:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:27:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 00:26:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm823-000482-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39606 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm821-0007ti-VU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm7p7-0003bQ-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm7p4-0007gf-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]:35810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm7p3-0007fX-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:13:29 -0400 Original-Received: by padcn9 with SMTP id cn9so2086324pad.2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:13:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Qx3oWtjF26XCADCW738CgcoXzI7YPoB2/u8t0WRb88=; b=y5QACieES53DOuZSJPGq9HMBWXVr4baTh/1abknKQvhMAIMhjC3MaDMg0EVdZcwZpC zA4PWDor1CBq/TdPmeb/lyaLKzaAFHBhDVGnGTkqVtvBVyzZkY6JNp96RzgvgPzStrGy 26wcCf1ShQc6mCTyehmaarRqTTiJ8NBAbI9jKsYo8j5GeXHQhszPuJEKq6ezegS0MrvG HndJXNkoTNNZVabrj65WzSk79m7arcCtHiuolnAtafS53Xi/LXzCfpOpH3fGeV4JDUGh V62YUkcWcZA317P4ArmSrGx/qZHreYAoOwjlEeC8JVh6q47SPHKdW6RFzom/cfcoW7T+ HpWQ== X-Received: by 10.68.240.73 with SMTP id vy9mr43842336pbc.24.1444774409245; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Hermes-2.local (99-121-201-99.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [99.121.201.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a17sm5689923pbu.55.2015.10.13.15.13.28 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Hermes-2.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8439B4725368; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:13:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d1wijwfs.fsf@fastmail.fm> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Andr=C3=A9s_Ram?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=ADrez=22's?= message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:22:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191515 Archived-At: >>>>> Andr=C3=A9s Ram=C3=ADrez writes: > Then of course I should mention priorities: > - IDE's features > - Concurrency > - Guile Emacs future?. Guile Emacs has been on several Google summer of > code. Would it need to be on another one?. Or Emacs is going to move on > another direction? I have three major priorities in mind for the near-term, and you've named t= wo. I'm happy to see that we're on a similar wavelength. But first, I want to know who will actually be the maintainer(s) before we have that discussion. When/if that day comes, I'll present a high-level proposal in collaboration with Richard and (hopefully) Eli, and then we can all decide from there where to best spend our discussive energies. John