From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrii Kolomoiets Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:47:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20201031194419.GC5887@ACM> <834kmago8m.fsf@gnu.org> <20201031203914.GD5887@ACM> <835z6ogc1h.fsf@gnu.org> <20201101195313.GA6190@ACM> <83sg9rd6cp.fsf@gnu.org> <20201102185147.GC7297@ACM> <83mtzzd0s3.fsf@gnu.org> <20201103210853.GA21923@ACM> <83ft5pax2p.fsf@gnu.org> <20201104173954.GA14535@ACM> <83v9ed3nbw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1633"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , enometh@meer.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 08:49:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcksX-0000LQ-V5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:49:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcksX-0004dd-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:49:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kckr4-00043v-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]:41447) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kckr3-0006gt-0A; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id v20so980956ljk.8; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:47:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=rxnGffB1pcO4BiJRYxaNfIYpOR0w11pdKfw03T00PbE=; b=Z28BzHgt6NVCB1uIuun3XvwfxwI8zBzFvB2slCi2nDkvysyUgHxHJl3ZnsUy5WjVkj PpTB1gNQ1x1CDBGiSCIHLx+YPpMRmvEv65wQaCHokRJRWgkg5iK+8Vub25bJScJpRXWr Vrjtk5aZJ5zuE8+B/5gV0lU9zhy3eiCZ/WZuE4Gl8TJYOkjFvm/O7NSQAedn6MLy6ZxD eSiRhhBMBhFoGYNlJL0fXZqGn6V8q35xxM4VpZMTPt2E3z9+NAj2xICJnT7Tizq17ihP QfkZ7nUx0KDxH3HjYLp77F3WgY20Brk5OUlPzNqjZ0vOxRsqM/r2+VNHV1tTc6wd2RRA 1cIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=rxnGffB1pcO4BiJRYxaNfIYpOR0w11pdKfw03T00PbE=; b=PzGezwPNwVqPo9zYNAIQHP+HEx6zir7763VTkZvrhSfbgtUtGztfpYZWHRQLavu6Bf 29iE1zAa6WpTorEyoTyFl7QsW+oQpMH4NuLGOeqATGUk7f48iWPKZTNEdpAFb3Q+gcTD 5NXBEnh2ZoxXWy2jruuN4/iD2BjOnyjGDqj2hYF+frtc+yf5Prr1OKTRUVFNNdBs/zvt tAhzWeDR35b13DJKklQOv6k+vxTWPh0nszqpa8aXaaMGT0KHdXxG+McLR+m4/LBKL1tO swmuesH+aTPGuDi+69Flx+H5/uz6OrqZGCK+2M3YcrkJqIgMF8gvDi4s74734G2GG1az dBPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ohUw7QPdHjLCZBUnpsaWo851ntp7ggSmkGh/xCfaxjEYKzVOg LaqxbdLHaQ+pb00viNlJ7DSxTraByr3yEw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQYH02/TYroRMaLC58xF+Xq4rdNuxEoug6ghgbqrlcQe1hLW6F50l+IIFO2zbupe5GCoHRaA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3210:: with SMTP id y16mr7670600ljy.395.1605080861860; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:47:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from muffinmac ([91.206.110.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m2sm114585lfl.228.2020.11.10.23.47.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:47:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:18:38 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::22d; envelope-from=andreyk.mad@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x22d.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259000 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> it arguably (philosophically) better matches the default setting of >>> `enable-recursive-minibuffers`. >> Maybe I'm missing something, but the message "Command attempted to use >> minibuffer while in minibuffer" is displayed in other frame, just like >> in Emacs 27. > > I'm not sure which scenario you're referring to. What I was referring > to is the fact that if you do `M-: (message "hello") RET`, the "hello" > message subsequently follows the selected frame (until it gets replaced > by another message or erased by command that doesn't emit any message). Sorry for not quoting the part of the message I was talking about. I'm referring to this scenario: C-x 5 2 M-x C-x 5 o M-x With the default setting of `enable-recursive-minibuffers`, the minibuffer is moved to active frame, but the error message is displayed in the other frame.