From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:29:01 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <83ziynma4s.fsf@gnu.org> <5640C6A0.5010709@yandex.ru> <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> <868u65afvh.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83r3jxlmfu.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvullky0.fsf@gnu.org> <83lha5lkpm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447184691 21667 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 19:44:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 20:44:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEqU-00036T-3o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:44:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35148 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEqU-0005Oa-22 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:44:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEpq-0004uY-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEpp-0004CA-Lo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]:33019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEpm-0004BY-JK; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so6079084pab.0; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:44:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=BJTzfnSocdnZX8/c88apveVNXzufgTNtbBmnfRsEmG0=; b=p/ruNZ4ngLEKkBVyhcJhAyk0Rj2FKxnH3+NBFMObKY21G3EimjIbngAl9CmuF8aaEz mnXJmj2KJ7NoExISo9OnGQvqSlwQ4Ka8PSii+h7sM99XA+6wpvBsUInZOyzUiK4yUucB CfM/15DfalUkHOj2jo2H8O6J8/P87QMJWo0SF9bl8oSwF1kmjIidjnlUJTTm14WkWo09 raA9UVRSs0TUbJyOTUREbEpF8jGxWNgMUkMdH9YmMcZigEe0VfEwJQLtdhkbXSRo4Lqt 3/43Mbclh/f9bDHypn1vvuK1L99Pz9p5WYlj9gy/wcOlykdtG/Qa/GjbkICYsT+zHdr7 O3zQ== X-Received: by 10.66.153.166 with SMTP id vh6mr8440336pab.83.1447184641925; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:44:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.attlocal.net (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id we9sm5621597pab.3.2015.11.10.11.43.57 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:43:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.attlocal.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id B6A751053AEDB; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:43:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83lha5lkpm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:26:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193945 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > How about if we leave this issue alone for a while? Let's concentrate on > releasing Emacs 25.1 first, and return to this issue later. Rome wasn't > built in one day, we don't have to rush. > > WDYT? Agreed. Let's table for now and revisit. If the suggested moves really trouble core developers, we'll talk about it again before making a final decision. John