From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sascha Wilde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bidi Subject: Re: Bidirectional editing in Emacs -- main design decisions Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:54:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83bpkgl113.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocofjqbg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255190097 8278 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2009 15:54:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-bidi@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 10 17:54:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MweHQ-0004cX-2I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:54:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MweHP-0001Pr-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:54:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MweHI-0001P9-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:54:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MweHH-0001Ox-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:54:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58132 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MweHF-0001OO-Uh; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail2.sha-bang.de ([78.47.120.114]:43974 helo=mail.sha-bang.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MweHB-0005Re-0s; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:54:33 -0400 Original-Received: from kenny.sha-bang.local (xdslcv099.osnanet.de [89.166.149.99]) by mail.sha-bang.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F343454E; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:54:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wilde by kenny.sha-bang.local with local (Sha Bang MUA v.0711184.68) ID 1MweH9-0004wP-IX; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:54:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83ocofjqbg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:06:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116069 gmane.emacs.bidi:418 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: [...] > Yes. That's what this part of my longish message was trying to say: > > In addition, being able to show these formatting codes to the user > is a valuable feature, because the way reordered text looks might > not be otherwise understood or changed easily. Oh, I see. I should have read your message even more carefully. Sorry for the noise. ;-) cheers sascha -- Sascha Wilde : VI is to EMACS as masturbation is to making love: : effective and always available but probably not your : first choice...