From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs on OS X development Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:48:50 -0500 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342201739 6933 80.91.229.3 (13 Jul 2012 17:48:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:48:59 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 13 19:48:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Spjz7-000655-Ud for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:48:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spjz7-0001Sp-AF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39199) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spjz4-0001SZ-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:48:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spjz3-0000Lh-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:54367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spjz3-0000LX-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: by yhr47 with SMTP id 47so4006434yhr.0 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:48:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:organization:references:mail-followup-to :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WE8uBvYr6HURUecMy/DsWGqmcyTumfFVxu707oqewfs=; b=nYlVvtFTUOfOz9CgWXDeCc5Qf0iVuUazSrqjQrCpsf0+tubEsTrXWb+1L+D5qpmuhl o0ypDUdFx/eBPSOZZMv7+eTHz4FRg4uAL+Gr1X2IUPCk9/7A6Z5kOcQCCL3wX8yPT0nE ObtOYZ0WrnNyyHjN+jX3icqqaaryA9PG+Awc5Y/RzcZ62t0mHLKtDbeIJe6f9jja+FqN JukGmYzpJlKkAlIIjTXmILmV0JjzUbccRdzziw9P9b8GgP6Y2fzfgG+xjU1xZuOKvY0k LM0iopWsO3Rt1Lg2uqcBy6ekbFU8+5THGu4YlMu/IkzkULo5fpR+tUXwi4czK/+eS+SL xaqQ== Original-Received: by 10.50.173.5 with SMTP id bg5mr1775679igc.35.1342201732532; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from vulcan.local (c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.215.105.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g5sm1958997ign.4.2012.07.13.10.48.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id B96CBF382B69; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:48:50 -0500 (CDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Ren=C3=A9?= Kyllingstad"'s message of "Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:00:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.213.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151598 Archived-At: >>>>> Ren=C3=A9 Kyllingstad writes: > At this point it seems like OS X and GNUstep are two different systems wi= th > a common ancestor in NeXTSTEP. > Adding the Mac Port to bzr would allow them to develop along with the sys= tem > they target, at the same time as it makes it much easier to share code wh= ere > it makes sense. Yes, I really think that GNUstep and OS X should be regarding as different targets, while sharing as much code as makes sense. OS X will only keep diverging. John